Nutritional Science: Evolving approaches to Molecular Homeostasis

  • Garima Pandey
  • abhay kumar pandey Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal
  • SS pandey
  • BL Pandey
Keywords: Nutrition, Synergy, Homeostasis, Nutrigenomics, Chronic disease prevention


Consumption of whole organisms by one another forms natural characteristic of food chains and apparent determinant of consistency of basic molecular constitution of live beings through the evolutionary sojourn. Progress in nutrition science appears best in consistency to nature’s health code in whole dietetic patterns, programmed for molecular homeostasis. Food production, consumption and utilization have been changing, posing challenges to address disturbances in homeostasis. With simple beginning of defining standard daily intakes, the task in nutrition science progressively gets complex. Impact of disturbed homeostasis is neither transient nor isolated as revealed by metabolic and genomic studies. It may cover within its fold the vulnerabilities from host-pathogen interactions to genesis of variety of chronic diseases and disability. Multidisciplinary advances in science including recent surge in genomics redefine approaches to address perspectives of molecular homeostasis. The very science of human nutrition however may sail to aspired destinations through disciplined adherence to holistic pursuits with new and traditional means and simultaneous awareness to environmental and social facts besides biomedicine.


1. Beauman C, Cannon G, Elmadfa I 2005 The principles, definition and dimensions of the new nutrition science. Public Health Nutr 8 695-698.
2. Beck MA 2007 Nutritionally induced oxidative stress: effect on viral disease. Am J Clin Nutr 71 S1676-S1681.
3. Booker GC, Leigh Star S 1999 Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. In Bijker WE, Carlson WB, Pinch T (eds), ‘Inside Technology’ MIT Press, Cambridge pp 377.
4. Choi S, Friso S 2010 Epigenetics: A new bridge between nutrition and health. Adv Nutr 1 8-16.
5. Choudhary M, Grover K 2012 Development of functional food products in relation to obesity. Functional foods in Health and Disease 2 188-197.
6. Food and Nutrition Board 2001 Dietary reference intakes for arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium and zinc. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
7. Food and Nutrition Board 2001 Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D and fluoride. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
8. Food and Nutrition Board 2001 Dietary reference intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, Selenium and Carotenoids. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
9. Jacobs DR Jr, Tapsell LC, Temple NJ 2011 Food synergy: The key to balancing nutrition research effort. Public Health Reviews 33 1-23.
10. Leitzmann C, Cannon G 2005 The new nutrition science project. Public Health Nutr 8 767-804.
11. Lithell HO, Mckelgue PM 1996 Relation of size at birth to non insulin dependent diabetes and insulin concentration in men aged 50-60 years. Br Med J 312 406-410.
12. Mathers CD, Murray CJL et al 2003 Health life expectancy: comparison of OECD countries in 2001. Austr NZ J Public Health 27 5-11.
13. Menon KKG, Natraj CV 1984 Nutrients in the shadow- nutrients of substance J Biosci 6 459-474.
14. Peltonen L, McKusick VA 2001 Dissecting human diseases in the post genomic era. Science 291 1224-1229.
15. Penders B 2007 Personalized diet: is it doable? Individuality at different sites of nutrigenomic practice. Genes Nutr 2 93-94.
16. Petrik J 2001 Microarray technology: The future of blood testing? Vox Sang 80:1-11.
17. Philips DIW 1996 Insulin resistance as a programmed response to foetal under-nutrition. Diabetologia 36 1119-1122.
18. Satter E 2007 Hierarchy of food needs. J Nutr Educ Behav. 39 187s-188s.
19. Seidell JC, Katin HS 2001 Report from centres for disease control and prevention workshop on use of adult anthropometry for public health and primary health care. Am J Clin Nutr 73 123-126.
20. Sunde RA 2001 Research needs for human nutrition in the post genomic sequencing era. J Nutr 131 3319-3323.
21. Teng-Peronard JL, Anderson HR et al 2011 Endocrine disrupting chemicals and obesity development in humans- a review Obes Rev 12 622-636.
22. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T 2012 Hormones and endocrine disrupting chemicals: low dose effects and non monotonic dose responses Endocrine Rev 33 378-455.
23. Wahlquist ML 2005 The new nutrition science: sustainability and development. Public Health Nutr 27 5-11.
24. Watson G 1972 Nutrition and your mind: The psychochemical perspective. Harper and Row, New York.
25. Williams RJ 1962 Nutrition in a nutshell. Doubleday and Co, New York.
26. Young VR 2003 A vision of the nutritional science in the third millennium in Elmadfa I, Anklan F, Konig J eds. Modern Aspects of Nutrition, Basel, Karger pp 24-29.